Some companies are investing heavily in 8K displays – but is this really the right way forward, or are they going to see diminishing returns? In this post, we’ll explain why you shouldn’t rush into 8K displays, and when they make the most sense.
What is 8K Resolution?
Put simply, 8K displays are 8,000 pixels wide. In theory, this means more “space” to show better visuals and make 8K content pop. This could even mean finer textures and stronger detail, with quadruple the pixels of 4K displays, which have only recently become relatively mainstream.
However, 8K remains quite niche. Most televisions with this resolution actually use AI to upscale 4K content, since there’s limited native 8K video. That said, some fields, such as film production, regularly use it – though it’s much less common in more traditional corporate AV settings.
8K’s Main Limitations
This isn’t to say 8K shouldn’t form part of your company’s AV tech stack, but you should at least be informed in case it’s not the best option. Here’s why 8K isn’t always worth the investment:
Limited Native Content
As stated above, there’s not much 8K video out there. Chances are, any 8K display you buy will mostly be playing upscaled or native 4K (possibly even 1080p) video. Unless you can guarantee your displays will regularly show genuine 8K content, it’s hard to justify them. 4K displays might make more sense for your company’s main needs.
Not Much Difference
Another downside of 8K is that it simply doesn’t seem that different in most cases. Your team or customers might not appreciate (or even notice) the extra clarity, especially on a screen that’s under 85 inches. Lecture theatres and large-scale security rooms might be another story – but really think about whether the quality will be noticeable.
High Demands
8K video requires high bitrates and storage space; one hour of content could take up a terabyte and use 50+ Mbps of bandwidth. 4K usually tops out at around 25 Mbps. If you deal with live 8K video, you might even need to upgrade to ultra-high-speed HDMI cables. Once again, you need to ask yourself if this is all worth it.
Performance Trade-Offs
These demands also mean performance suffers, usually in the form of stuttering or lag, and this simply isn’t an option in some settings. For example, you need 100% reliability in mission-critical AV. The slightest delay could cost your team valuable seconds during a critical security incident, and the extra clarity 8K offers is not enough to justify it.
High Costs
8K displays, and the infrastructure they require (such as 10GbE technology) add up quickly. You could spend at least $2,500 on a standard 8K monitor. A larger control room monitor could push this beyond $10,000. This naturally depends on the brand and the screen’s dimensions – but 4K options will usually cost around a third of the equivalent 8K option, maybe even less.
When You Should Use 8K
8K is best on massive screens at least 120 inches wide, ironically meaning even higher costs to the business just to see the difference. Any screen smaller than this, and 4K is more than good enough. Here’s where an 8K-capable screen actually helps:
● Hosting meetings in large conference rooms with many participants
● Monitoring security operations and live situations (only if you can avoid lag)
● Designing large-scale signage installations spanning across entire walls
● Creating immersive multisensory experiences for customers/visitors
You shouldn’t use 8K just to future-proof your AV tech stack; here, it’s better to use flexible tech that can be upgraded more easily in the years to come. Your company must only invest in these screens if the added pixel density actually matters and will be noticed today.
Final Thoughts
4K60 displays are usually all you’ll need to create stunning HD visuals that amaze customers or ensure cohesive, glitch-free presentations. Don’t rush into an 8K screen you don’t need, or your company could be spending money without a noticeable impact.
